EvidenceSheet

3.5.1.3 Disk-level encryption key management

If disk-level or partition-level encryption is used, cryptographic keys are managed in accordance with Requirements 3.6 and 3.7.

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • HSM or KMS evidence · Key management / PKI
  • Audit log review · Key management / PKI

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Key custodian assignments · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Key storage and rotation procedures · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Access control to keys · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

3.5.1.2 Disk-level encryption with logical access controls · 3.6.1 Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.