EvidenceSheet

11.1.1 Requirement 11 policies and procedures managed

Every security policy and operational procedure named anywhere in Requirement 11 (security testing of systems and networks) must satisfy four conditions: it is written down, it is maintained so it stays current, it is actually followed in practice, and every affected party is aware of it. In practice these are the documents behind the Requirement 11 topics (wireless detection, vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, intrusion and change detection, payment page monitoring). Guidance (good practice): consider revising the documents soon after a change in processes, technology or business goals, not only on a periodic cycle. Customized approach objective: personnel understand and follow defined expectations, controls and oversight for Requirement 11 work, so that supporting activities are repeatable, consistent and aligned with what management intends.

Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 11.1.1. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.

Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.

4
artefacts
1
held by a system
1
at each review
moderate
to go live
SIEM / log platform
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Change log tying document revisions to process or technology changes · SIEM / log platform

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Distribution or acknowledgement records showing affected staff received the documents · HR system / LMS

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Approved security testing policy covering Requirement 11 topics, with version history and last review date · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Operational procedures for scanning, penetration testing, IDS/IPS, FIM and payment page monitoring · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Start with the 1 of 4 artefacts that already live in a system (SIEM / log platform); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

10.7.3 Respond promptly to critical security control failures · 11.1.2 Roles for security testing assigned and understood