EvidenceSheet
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · MEASURE - NIST AI RMF 1.0

MS-2.11 Fairness and bias as identified in the MAP function is evaluated and results are documented

Fairness and bias – as identified in the MAP function – is evaluated and results are documented. Fairness evaluation states which fairness definition was applied and why, evaluates against it, and records the results including where the definition itself is contested.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, MS-2.11. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
0
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

none for this control

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The fairness definition or definitions applied and the reason for choosing them · Document repository
  • Evaluation results disaggregated across the relevant groups · Document repository
  • Identification of the groups assessed and the basis for that selection · Document repository
  • Documentation of trade-offs where fairness definitions conflict · Document repository

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

MS-2.10 Privacy risk of the AI system as identified in the MAP function is examined and documented · MS-2.12 Environmental impact and sustainability of AI model training and management activities as identified in the…