EvidenceSheet
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · GOVERN - NIST AI RMF 1.0

GV-5.1 Organizational policies and practices are in place to collect, consider, prioritize, and integrate feedback…

Organizational policies and practices are in place to collect, consider, prioritize, and integrate feedback from those external to the team that developed or deployed the AI system regarding the potential individual and societal impacts related to AI risks. External feedback is solicited under a policy, prioritised on a stated basis and carried into the system, rather than collected and filed.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, GV-5.1. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Policy establishing how external feedback on AI impacts is collected · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Records of stakeholder engagement activity, including who was engaged · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The prioritisation basis applied to feedback received · Document repository
  • Traceability from a specific piece of feedback to a change made · Document repository

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

GV-4.3 Organizational practices are in place to enable AI testing, identification of incidents, and information… · GV-5.2 Mechanisms are established to enable AI actors to regularly incorporate adjudicated feedback from relevant AI…