GV-5.2 Mechanisms are established to enable AI actors to regularly incorporate adjudicated feedback from relevant AI actors into system design and implementation
Mechanisms are established to enable AI actors to regularly incorporate adjudicated feedback from relevant AI actors into system design and implementation. There is a mechanism that adjudicates feedback and routes the ac
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Change records showing accepted feedback implemented · Document repository
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Records of feedback adjudicated, with accept or reject reasoning · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- The adjudication mechanism and who holds the decision on what is accepted · Document repository
- The cadence at which adjudicated feedback enters design or implementation · Document repository
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Feedback adjudicated informally, so rejections carry no reasoning
- Accepted items queued indefinitely with no implementation cycle
- Mechanism covers internal actors only and excludes deployers and end users
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetGV-5.1 Organizational policies and practices are in place to collect, consider, prioritize, and integrate feedback from those external to the team that developed or deployed the AI system regarding the potential individual and societal impacts related to AI risks · GV-6.1 Policies and procedures are in place that address AI risks associated with third-party entities, including risks of infringement of a third party's intellectual property or other rights