EvidenceSheet
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · GOVERN - NIST AI RMF 1.0

GV-4.3 Organizational practices are in place to enable AI testing, identification of incidents, and information…

Organizational practices are in place to enable AI testing, identification of incidents, and information sharing. Testing and incident identification are enabled by practice and resourcing, and information about failures is shared with the parties who need it rather than contained.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, GV-4.3. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Records of information shared internally or externally about identified issues · Document repository
  • Evidence of resourcing for testing independent of the delivery schedule · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • In-house testing policy covering the failure modes AI introduces · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • The incident identification and recording mechanism for AI systems · Document repository

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

GV-4.2 Organizational teams document the risks and potential impacts of the AI technology they design, develop… · GV-5.1 Organizational policies and practices are in place to collect, consider, prioritize, and integrate feedback…