EvidenceSheet
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · GOVERN - NIST AI RMF 1.0

GV-1.3 Processes and procedures are in place to determine the needed level of risk management activities based on…

Processes and procedures are in place to determine the needed level of risk management activities based on the organization's risk tolerance. Risk management effort is allocated by a documented rule rather than by availability, so a system assessed as higher risk demonstrably receives more scrutiny than a lower-risk one.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, GV-1.3. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Tier assignment records for the AI systems in the inventory, with the reasoning · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Evidence that a high-tier system actually received the additional activities its tier requires · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The documented risk tiering criteria and the scale risks are assigned to · Document repository
  • The activity set required at each tier, showing what changes between tiers · Document repository

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

GV-1.2 The characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, and procedures · GV-1.4 The risk management process and its outcomes are established through transparent policies, procedures, and…