EvidenceSheet

GV-1.2 The characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, and procedures

The characteristics of trustworthy AI are integrated into organizational policies, processes, and procedures. Validity, reliability, safety, security, resilience, accountability, transparency, explainability, privacy and fairness appear as named obligations inside the policies that govern the AI lifecycle, not only in a statement of values.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, GV-1.2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Approval record with authority and effective date, and the scheduled review interval · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Approved AI policy set naming each trustworthiness characteristic as an obligation with an owner · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedure documents showing where in the lifecycle each characteristic is assessed · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Evidence the policies were communicated to the teams that design, develop and deploy AI · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

GV-1.1 Legal and regulatory requirements involving AI are understood, managed, and documented · GV-1.3 Processes and procedures are in place to determine the needed level of risk management activities based on…