EvidenceSheet

GV-1.4 The risk management process and its outcomes are established through transparent policies, procedures, and other controls based on organizational risk priorities

The risk management process and its outcomes are established through transparent policies, procedures, and other controls based on organizational risk priorities. The process and the decisions it produced are both docume

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Completed records for deployed systems showing the process was followed, not just defined · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The documented AI risk management process, with the decision points it contains · Document repository
  • Standardised documentation templates used across AI work products · Document repository
  • Named accountable contacts recorded on work products so decisions are traceable to people · Document repository

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

GV-1.3 Processes and procedures are in place to determine the needed level of risk management activities based on the organization's risk tolerance · GV-1.5 Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned, organizational roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, including determining the frequency of periodic review