EvidenceSheet

CC6.4 Restricting physical access to facilities and assets

Physical access to facilities and protected assets such as data centres, rooms holding backup media and other sensitive spaces is limited to authorised personnel. Points of focus: physical access for staff, contractors, vendors and partner personnel to data centres, offices and work areas is created or changed on appropriate authorisation; it is removed when no longer needed; organisation devices such as badges, laptops and phones are recovered when the holder no longer needs access (added in 2022); and access is reviewed periodically against job responsibilities. Where facilities are run by a hosting or cloud provider, the provider's SOC report and the complementary controls it expects are part of the evidence.

Source: SOC 2 (2017 Trust Services Criteria), CC6.4. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open SOC 2 (2017 Trust Services Criteria) in the compliance library.

These are criteria, not controls: you design controls that meet them, and which criteria are in scope follows the categories your report covers (Security always; Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity and Privacy only if chosen). A Type 2 report tests that the controls operated across the period, so the evidence asked for is samples across that period, not one copy.

5
artefacts
1
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Physical access / facilities
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Badge access provisioning and removal records · Physical access / facilities

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Periodic physical access review for sensitive areas · Physical access / facilities
  • Data centre or cloud provider SOC report reviewed for this criterion · Physical access / facilities

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Visitor logs and escort procedure · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Leaver checklist showing return of badges, laptops and mobile devices · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Mostly documents and reviews. Pull the 1 system-held artefact from your Physical access / facilities on a schedule; put the documents under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties · CC6.5 Protecting data on assets until disposal