EvidenceSheet

7.2.5 Application and system accounts least privilege

Every application and system account and its related access privileges must be assigned and managed so that: privileges are the least needed for the system or application to operate; and access is limited to those systems, processes or applications that have a specific need for the account. The guidance explains that a compromised service account gives an attacker whatever the account can reach, and suggests entities may consider a baseline that keeps such accounts out of privileged groups such as domain or local administrators or root, restricts the machines and hours they can be used, and removes VPN or remote access. Objective under the customized approach: the rights given to system and application accounts are confined to what that application or system needs to operate. Future-dated: treated as a best practice up to 31 March 2025 and mandatory since then.

Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 7.2.5. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.

Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.

4
artefacts
2
held by a system
0
at each review
easy
to go live
Identity provider / directory
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Inventory of application and system (service) accounts with owner, purpose and systems used · Identity provider / directory
  • Privilege and group membership export for each service account · Identity provider / directory

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

none for this control

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Service account baseline or standard (no privileged group membership, host and time restrictions) · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedure for requesting and approving new application or system accounts · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Automate the pull from your Identity provider / directory. Scheduled export of users, roles and MFA state from the directory; access-review completion pulled from the IdP, not a spreadsheet.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

7.2.4 User accounts and privileges reviewed every six months · 7.2.5.1 Application and system account access reviewed periodically