EvidenceSheet

7.2.5.1 App and system account review cadence

Application and system account access is reviewed at a frequency defined in the entity's targeted risk analysis (TRA).

5
artefacts
1
held by a system
4
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Audit log of permission changes · Identity provider / directory

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • TRA document supporting chosen review frequency · Document repository
  • Review schedule and completed review reports · Document repository
  • Tickets remediating findings from reviews · Ticketing / ITSM
  • Sign-off from account owner per review · Identity provider / directory

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

none for this control

First move

Mostly documents and reviews. Pull the 1 system-held artefact from your Identity provider / directory on a schedule; put the documents under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

7.2.5 All application and system accounts and related access privileges are assigned and managed as follows: • Based on the least privileges necessary for the operability of the system or application. • Access is limited · 7.2.6 All user access to query repositories of stored cardholder data is restricted as follows: • Via applications or other programmatic methods, with access and allowed actions based on user roles and least privileges. •