11.2.1 Detect authorized and rogue wireless access points
The entity manages wireless access points, authorized or not, by: testing for the presence of Wi-Fi access points; detecting and identifying every authorized and unauthorized access point; performing this testing, detection and identification at least every three months; and, where automated monitoring is in place, notifying personnel through generated alerts. Guidance (examples and good practice): methods may include wireless scans, physical or logical inspection, network access control or wireless IDS/IPS, combined as the environment's size and complexity dictate. Applicability: the requirement still applies where policy bans wireless technology, and the chosen methods must be able to find both authorized and unauthorized devices, including rogue devices plugged into equipment that is itself authorized. Objective under the customized approach: rogue wireless access points are found and dealt with on a periodic basis.
Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 11.2.1. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.
Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Wireless scan or rogue AP detection reports for each quarter of the last 12 months · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
- NAC or wireless IDS/IPS alert configuration and sample alert notifications · SIEM / log platform
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Records of investigation and removal of any rogue access points found · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Wireless detection procedure describing the methods used per site · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Physical inspection checklists for locations where scanning is impractical · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Scanning skipped at sites with a no-wireless policy
- Only one or two quarters of results available instead of every three months
- Scanner only covers the head office, leaving branches or data centres untested
- Automated tool generates alerts that route to an unmonitored mailbox
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet11.1.2 Roles for security testing assigned and understood · 11.2.2 Inventory of authorized wireless access points