EvidenceSheet

11.2.1 Detect authorized and rogue wireless access points

The entity manages wireless access points, authorized or not, by: testing for the presence of Wi-Fi access points; detecting and identifying every authorized and unauthorized access point; performing this testing, detection and identification at least every three months; and, where automated monitoring is in place, notifying personnel through generated alerts. Guidance (examples and good practice): methods may include wireless scans, physical or logical inspection, network access control or wireless IDS/IPS, combined as the environment's size and complexity dictate. Applicability: the requirement still applies where policy bans wireless technology, and the chosen methods must be able to find both authorized and unauthorized devices, including rogue devices plugged into equipment that is itself authorized. Objective under the customized approach: rogue wireless access points are found and dealt with on a periodic basis.

Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 11.2.1. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.

Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.

5
artefacts
2
held by a system
1
at each review
moderate
to go live
Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Wireless scan or rogue AP detection reports for each quarter of the last 12 months · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
  • NAC or wireless IDS/IPS alert configuration and sample alert notifications · SIEM / log platform

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Records of investigation and removal of any rogue access points found · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Wireless detection procedure describing the methods used per site · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Physical inspection checklists for locations where scanning is impractical · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Start with the 2 of 5 artefacts that already live in a system (Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

11.1.2 Roles for security testing assigned and understood · 11.2.2 Inventory of authorized wireless access points