ID.RA-09 The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use
The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use.
5
artefacts
1
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Audit trail of changes to risk records · SIEM / log platform
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Peer review records on assessment outputs · Document repository
- Independent validation of high impact assessments · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Quality assurance procedure for risk assessments · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Source citation requirements for risk inputs · Document repository
First move
Mostly documents and reviews. Pull the 1 system-held artefact from your SIEM / log platform on a schedule; put the documents under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a dated record with a named reviewer.
Common gaps auditors find
- Peer review absent for time pressured assessments
- Sources not cited for risk inputs
- Audit trail incomplete
- Validation overridden by leadership
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetID.RA-08 Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established · ID.RA-10 Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition