ID.RA-08 Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established
Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established
Source: NIST CSF 2.0, ID.RA-08. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST CSF 2.0 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Control effectiveness testing reports · Document repository
- Risk response effectiveness review minutes · Policy repository / GRC workspace
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Key risk indicator trending with thresholds · Document repository
- Independent validation of high risk responses · Document repository
- Closure tracking when responses fail · Document repository
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Control testing infrequent
- KRIs flat with no investigation
- Effectiveness reviews narrative only
- Independent validation absent
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetID.RA-07 Changes and exceptions are managed, assessed for risk impact, recorded, and tracked · ID.RA-09 The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use