EvidenceSheet
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · MEASURE - NIST AI RMF 1.0

MS-2.7 AI system security and resilience as identified in the MAP function are evaluated and documented

AI system security and resilience – as identified in the MAP function – are evaluated and documented. Security and resilience evaluation addresses the AI-specific attack surface, adversarial input, poisoning, extraction and supply chain, and records whether the system degrades gracefully.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, MS-2.7. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
2
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evaluation results for AI-specific security risks, including adversarial input and data poisoning · Document repository
  • Model and data supply chain integrity checks · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Resilience testing showing behaviour under unexpected adverse events or environment change · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Documentation of the evaluation traced to the security risks mapping identified · Document repository

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

MS-2.6 AI system is evaluated regularly for safety risks as identified in the MAP function, is demonstrated to be… · MS-2.8 Risks associated with transparency and accountability as identified in the MAP function are examined and…