GV-2.2 The organization's personnel and partners receive AI risk management training to enable them to perform their…
The organization’s personnel and partners receive AI risk management training to enable them to perform their duties and responsibilities consistent with related policies, procedures, and agreements. Training is role-specific and its completion is recorded, and partners bound by agreements are covered as well as employees.
Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, GV-2.2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Completion records by individual and date, including partner personnel where in scope · HR system / LMS
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Evidence of refresh when policies or applicable law changed · Policy repository / GRC workspace
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Training curricula differentiated by AI role, with the content covered · HR system / LMS
- The link from a role definition to the training required for it · HR system / LMS
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- One general awareness module issued to everyone regardless of AI duty
- Partner and contractor personnel excluded despite performing AI lifecycle tasks
- Completion tracked but no record of what the training actually covered
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetGV-2.1 Roles and responsibilities and lines of communication related to mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks… · GV-2.3 Executive leadership of the organization takes responsibility for decisions about risks associated with AI…