EvidenceSheet
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · SC - System and Communications Protection

SC-39(2) Process Isolation | Separate Execution Domain Per Thread

Maintain a separate execution domain for each thread in organization-defined multi-threaded processing.

Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, SC-39(2). The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.

Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.

10
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Test of System capability implementing a separate execution domain for each thread in multi-threaded processing · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • System and communications protection policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System design documentation · Document repository
  • System configuration settings and associated documentation · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System architecture · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • List of system execution domains for each thread in multi-threaded processing · Document repository
  • System documentation for multi-threaded processing · Document repository
  • System documentation from vendors, manufacturers, or developers · Vendor register / contract repository
  • Independent verification and validation documentation · Document repository
  • System security plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

SC-39(1) Process Isolation | Hardware Separation · SC-40 Wireless Link Protection