EvidenceSheet
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · SA - System and Services Acquisition

SA-2 Allocation of Resources

a. Determine the high-level information security and privacy requirements for the system or system service in mission and business process planning; b. Determine, document, and allocate the resources required to protect the system or system service as part of the organizational capital planning and investment control process; and c. Establish a discrete line item for information security and privacy in organizational programming and budgeting documentation.

Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, SA-2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.

Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.

10
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Test of Organizational processes for determining information security and privacy requirements; organizational processes for capital planning, programming, and budgeting; mechanisms supporting and/or implementing organizational capital planning, programming, and budgeting · Data governance / DLP tooling

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • System and services acquisition policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System and services acquisition procedures · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System and services acquisition strategy and plans · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedures addressing the allocation of resources to information security and privacy requirements · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedures addressing capital planning and investment control · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Organizational programming and budgeting documentation · Document repository
  • System security plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Privacy plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Supply chain risk management policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

SA-1 Policy and Procedures · SA-3 System Development Life Cycle