EvidenceSheet
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · CP - Contingency Planning

CP-7 Alternate Processing Site

a. Establish an alternate processing site, including necessary agreements to permit the transfer and resumption of organization-defined system operations for essential mission and business functions within organization-defined time period consistent with recovery time and recovery point objectives when the primary processing capabilities are unavailable; b. Make available at the alternate processing site, the equipment and supplies required to transfer and resume operations or put contracts in place to support delivery to the site within the organization-defined time period for transfer and resumption; and c. Provide controls at the alternate processing site that are equivalent to those at the primary site.

Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, CP-7. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.

Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.

10
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Test of Organizational processes for recovery at the alternate site; mechanisms supporting and/or implementing recovery at the alternate processing site · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Contingency planning policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedures addressing alternate processing sites · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Contingency plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Alternate processing site agreements · Vendor register / contract repository
  • Primary processing site agreements · Vendor register / contract repository
  • Spare equipment and supplies inventory at alternate processing site · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Equipment and supply contracts · Vendor register / contract repository
  • Service-level agreements · Vendor register / contract repository
  • System security plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

CP-6(3) Alternate Storage Site | Accessibility · CP-7(1) Alternate Processing Site | Separation from Primary Site