CA-2 Control Assessments
a. Select the appropriate assessor or assessment team for the type of assessment to be conducted; b. Develop a control assessment plan that describes the scope of the assessment including: 1. Controls and control enhancements under assessment; 2. Assessment procedures to be used to determine control effectiveness; and 3. Assessment environment, assessment team, and assessment roles and responsibilities; c. Ensure the control assessment plan is reviewed and approved by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to conducting the assessment; d. Assess the controls in the system and its environment of operation organization-defined frequency to determine the extent to which the controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and producing the desired outcome with respect to meeting established security and privacy requirements; e. Produce a control assessment report that document the results of the assessment; and f. Provide the results of the control assessment to organization-defined individuals or roles.
Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, CA-2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.
Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Procedures addressing assessment planning · SIEM / log platform
- Procedures addressing control assessments · SIEM / log platform
- Control assessment report · SIEM / log platform
- Test of Mechanisms supporting control assessment, control assessment plan development, and/or control assessment reporting · SIEM / log platform
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Assessment, authorization, and monitoring policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Control assessment plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- System security plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Privacy plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- The control assessment plan lacks assessment procedures and roles, and was not approved by the authorizing official before assessment
- No control assessment report is produced, and results are not provided to the organization-defined individuals or roles
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetCA-1 Policy and Procedures · CA-2(1) Control Assessments | Independent Assessors