9.3.2 Management review inputs
The management review shall take into account: progress on actions agreed at earlier reviews; shifts in the internal and external issues that bear on the PIMS; shifts in what relevant interested parties need and expect; how the PIMS is performing, including patterns in nonconformities and corrective actions, in monitoring and measurement results and in audit findings; and openings for continual improvement. The Robere correspondence table notes that three inputs the first edition took from the ISMS (achievement of objectives, feedback from interested parties, and risk assessment results) no longer appear as items of their own.
Source: ISO/IEC 27701:2025, 9.3.2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open ISO/IEC 27701:2025 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Review input pack covering each required item · Policy repository / GRC workspace
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Trend information on nonconformities, measurement and audit results · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Consideration of changes in context and interested party expectations · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Inputs that omit changes in privacy law or regulator expectations
- Nonconformities listed with no trend analysis
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet