EvidenceSheet

8.25 Secure development life cycle

Requires rules covering the secure development of both software and systems to be established and applied.

5
artefacts
1
held by a system
3
at each review
hard
to go live
Source control / CI pipeline
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Evidence of enforcement, such as pipeline gates that stop a release failing a security requirement · Source control / CI pipeline

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evidence the rules apply to all development, including agile teams, integration work and vendor delivered code · Source control / CI pipeline
  • Evidence of security activities at each stage, such as threat modelling, secure design review, code review and security testing · Source control / CI pipeline
  • Records of developer security competence and training · Source control / CI pipeline

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The secure development rules covering the full lifecycle, from requirements through design, build, test and release · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Mostly documents and reviews. Pull the 1 system-held artefact from your Source control / CI pipeline on a schedule; put the documents under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

8.24 Use of cryptography · 8.26 Application security requirements