EvidenceSheet

5.26 Response to information security incidents

Requires information security incidents to be responded to in accordance with documented procedures, rather than improvised case by case.

5
artefacts
1
held by a system
3
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Closure records showing the criteria for closure were met · Document repository

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Incident records carrying detection, containment, eradication and recovery timestamps and the actions taken at each stage · Document repository
  • Evidence of decisions taken during response and by whom, including any decision to preserve rather than eradicate · Document repository
  • Communication records to internal stakeholders, affected parties, authorities and customers where required · Policy repository / GRC workspace

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Documented response procedures per incident type, and evidence they were followed in actual incidents · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Mostly documents and reviews. Pull the 1 system-held artefact from your Document repository on a schedule; put the documents under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events · 5.27 Learning from information security incidents