EvidenceSheet

8.4.4 Business continuity plans

Document and keep up business continuity plans that lead teams through response and recovery. Taken together, the plans set out: the actions for keeping prioritized activities going, or restoring them, within time frames fixed in advance; how the disruption and the response will be monitored; the thresholds set beforehand, and the process, for triggering the response; procedures for delivering products and services at the capacity agreed; and how the immediate effects are handled with regard to people's welfare, avoiding further loss, and the environment. Each plan must state its purpose, scope and objectives; the roles and duties of the team that carries it out; the actions that put the solutions into effect; the supporting information needed to trigger, run, coordinate and communicate the response, including the triggering criteria, internal and external interdependencies, what resources are needed, what must be reported, and how the response is stood down; and it must be usable and to hand when and where it is needed.

Source: ISO 22301:2019, 8.4.4. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open ISO 22301:2019 in the compliance library.

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evidence of availability at the point of use, including offline copies · Policy repository / GRC workspace

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Plan set with each plan carrying every required element · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Activation criteria and thresholds stated in the plan itself · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Interdependency and resource sections reconciled to the BIA · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Stand down process defined · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

8.4.3 Warning and communication · 8.4.5 Recovery