EvidenceSheet

Art.9 Processing of special categories of personal data

Do not process personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs or trade union membership, nor genetic data, biometric data processed to uniquely identify a person,

5
artefacts
1
held by a system
0
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Explicit consent records showing the consent was explicit and specific to the special category processing · Data governance / DLP tooling

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

none for this control

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • An inventory identifying where special category data is held, including where it is inferred rather than collected · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • The Article 9(2) condition recorded per activity alongside its separate Article 6 basis · Document repository
  • The Union or Member State law relied on where the condition requires one, cited to the provision · Document repository
  • Professional secrecy or equivalent confidentiality obligations evidenced for staff handling health data under point (h) · Document repository

First move

Mostly documents and reviews. Pull the 1 system-held artefact from your Data governance / DLP tooling on a schedule; put the documents under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

Art.8 Conditions applicable to child's consent · Art.10 Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions