EvidenceSheet

Art.8 Conditions applicable to child's consent

Where consent is the lawful basis and information society services are offered directly to a child, processing the child's personal data on the child's own consent is lawful only from age 16, or from the lower age a Memb

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
3
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • The assessment of whether the service is an information society service offered directly to children · Document repository
  • The age threshold applied per Member State, with evidence the applicable national lower age was checked rather than assumed · Document repository
  • Parental authorisation records where the user is below the threshold, including the verification carried out on the parent · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The age assurance mechanism, and the reasoning for why it is a reasonable effort given available technology · Document repository
  • The procedure and records for what happens when a user is identified as under age after registration · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

Art.7 Conditions for consent · Art.9 Processing of special categories of personal data