OIS-06 Risk Management Policy
Document, communicate and make available a risk management procedure that covers identification of confidentiality, integrity, availability and authenticity risks with named risk owners, likelihood and impact analysis, e
4
artefacts
1
held by a system
0
at each review
moderate
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Approval and version history of the risk methodology document · Document repository
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
none for this control
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Approved risk management procedure setting out method, rating scales and prioritisation rules · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Risk criteria table defining likelihood and impact bands and the acceptance thresholds · Document repository
- Risk record template or tool configuration that forces a named owner on every entry · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Start with the 1 of 4 artefacts that already live in a system (Document repository); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.
Common gaps auditors find
- No stated acceptance criteria, so each risk is judged ad hoc
- Ownership recorded at department level instead of naming an accountable individual
- Method addresses confidentiality alone and omits authenticity and availability
- Procedure written but never distributed to the staff expected to apply it
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetOIS-05 Contact with Relevant Government Agencies and Interest Groups · OIS-07 Application of the Risk Management Policy