CPS 230 para 61 Internal audit review of critical-operation outsourcing and reporting to the Board
Internal audit must review any proposed material arrangement that would outsource a critical operation, and must give regular reports to the Board (or its audit committee) on whether such arrangements comply with the service provider management policy.
Source: APRA CPS 230, CPS 230 para 61. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open APRA CPS 230 in the compliance library.
Applies to APRA-regulated entities.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Internal audit review reports on proposed critical-operation outsourcing, dated before approval · Vendor register / contract repository
- Regular internal audit reports to the Board or audit committee on policy compliance of outsourcing arrangements · Vendor register / contract repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Internal audit plan entries covering service provider compliance · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Internal audit engaged only after the contract was signed
- Compliance reporting covers a sample but not the population of critical-operation outsourcing
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet