CPS 230 para 60 Internal Audit Review of Proposed Critical Operation Outsourcing
Internal audit must review any proposed material arrangement that would outsource a critical operation, and must report regularly to the Board or Board Audit Committee on whether such arrangements comply with the entity
3
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Internal audit reviews of proposed critical operation outsourcing · Vendor register / contract repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Reports to the Board or Board Audit Committee · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Compliance assessments against the service provider policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.
Common gaps auditors find
- Audit engaged after signature rather than at proposal stage
- No regular reporting cadence to the Board
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetCPS 230 para 59 APRA Notification of Service Agreements and Offshoring