EvidenceSheet

CC7.3 Evaluates security events to determine incident status

Evaluates security events to determine whether they could or have resulted in a failure of the entity to meet its objectives (security incidents) and, if so, takes actions to prevent or address such failures.

5
artefacts
0
held by a system
4
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Records of events evaluated during the period, including those determined not to be incidents, with the reasoning · Document repository
  • Evidence of who performs the evaluation and their authority to declare an incident · Document repository
  • Evidence of the actions taken to prevent or address a failure, following the determination · Document repository
  • Evidence of communication of the determination to those who need to act on it · Policy repository / GRC workspace

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The criteria for evaluating whether a security event could result or has resulted in a failure to meet objectives · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

CC7.2 Monitors system components for anomalies indicating malicious acts · CC7.4 Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures