EvidenceSheet

CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities

Detection and monitoring identify configuration changes that introduce vulnerabilities and exposure to newly discovered vulnerabilities. Points of focus: configuration standards are defined; infrastructure and software are monitored for departures from them; change-detection such as file integrity monitoring alerts staff to unauthorised changes to critical system, configuration or content files; unknown or unauthorised components are detected; and vulnerability scans run periodically and after significant change, with identified weaknesses acted on promptly enough to support objectives; the 2022 revision ties configuration standards expressly to hardening infrastructure and software.

Source: SOC 2 (2017 Trust Services Criteria), CC7.1. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open SOC 2 (2017 Trust Services Criteria) in the compliance library.

These are criteria, not controls: you design controls that meet them, and which criteria are in scope follows the categories your report covers (Security always; Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity and Privacy only if chosen). A Type 2 report tests that the controls operated across the period, so the evidence asked for is samples across that period, not one copy.

4
artefacts
2
held by a system
0
at each review
easy
to go live
Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Configuration compliance scan results · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
  • Vulnerability scan reports and remediation tickets with timelines · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

none for this control

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Hardening standards or benchmarks for in-scope platforms · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Asset discovery showing detection of unauthorised devices · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Automate the pull from your Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling. Scan schedule, findings and remediation age straight from the scanner; patch compliance from the patch console.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

CC6.8 Preventing and detecting unauthorised or malicious software · CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies