5.3.5 Users cannot disable or alter anti-malware
Users must not be able to turn off or change anti-malware mechanisms, except where this is specifically documented and authorised by management case by case, for a limited period. Where disabling is needed (for example for maintenance or troubleshooting) the reason should be understood and approved, the change carried out by authorised personnel, and alerting and follow-up should exist when administrators disable protection on their own devices. Applicability: temporary disabling is permitted only for a legitimate technical need with case-by-case management authorisation, and must be formally approved; extra safeguards may be needed while protection is off, such as disconnecting the system from the Internet and running a full scan once protection is restored. Customized approach objective: unauthorised personnel cannot modify anti-malware mechanisms.
Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 5.3.5. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.
Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Configuration showing tamper protection or password-protected settings on the anti-malware agent · Endpoint management (MDM / EDR)
- Exception request tickets approving temporary disablement, with scope, reason and end date · Endpoint management (MDM / EDR)
- Alerts generated when protection is disabled, and the follow-up records · Endpoint management (MDM / EDR)
- Evidence of compensating measures during disablement and a full scan afterwards · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
none for this control
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
none for this control
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Local administrators on workstations can stop the agent service without triggering an alert
- Exclusions or disablement approved indefinitely with no expiry date
- Disablement done informally by engineers with no ticket or management approval
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet5.3.4 Anti-malware audit logs enabled and retained · 5.4.1 Mechanisms detect and protect against phishing