2.2.5 Insecure services, protocols or daemons secured
Where any insecure service, protocol or daemon is present on system components: (a) the business justification is documented; and (b) additional security features that lower the risk of using them are documented and implemented. The guidance recommends enabling security features before new components are deployed, so insecure configurations do not enter the environment. Applicability: no special notes; applies to every assessed entity. Customized approach objective: no insecure service, protocol or daemon can be used as a route to compromise system components.
Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 2.2.5. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.
Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Configuration evidence that those features are active on the affected systems · Cloud console / configuration management
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Interview notes with system owners confirming justification is current · Cloud console / configuration management
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Register of insecure services, protocols and daemons present on system components, with business justification · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Documented additional security features for each (for example wrapping in an encrypted tunnel, host restrictions) · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Legacy protocols such as SMBv1 or TLS 1.0 enabled with no documented justification
- Justification recorded but compensating features never implemented
- Insecure items not identified because no authoritative reference list is used
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheet2.2.4 Only necessary functionality enabled · 2.2.6 System security parameters configured against misuse