EvidenceSheet

12.5.2 Annual and change-driven scope confirmation

The entity must document its PCI DSS scope and confirm it at least once every 12 months, plus whenever the in-scope environment changes significantly. The scoping validation must at minimum: identify all data flows across payment stages (for instance authorisation, capture, settlement, chargebacks, refunds) and every acceptance channel (for instance card-present, card-not-present, e-commerce); update all data-flow diagrams under Requirement 1.2.4; identify every place where account data is held, processed or sent, including places outside the current CDE, applications handling CHD, data transmitted across networks and systems, and backups of files; identify all components in, connected to, or able to affect the CDE; identify all segmentation controls and the environments segmented from the CDE, with justification for out-of-scope environments; identify all third-party connections with CDE access; and confirm all these items are included in scope. Applicability: this is the entity's own confirmation and is separate from, and not replaced by, the assessor's scoping check during the annual assessment. Objective under the customized approach: scope is checked periodically and after significant change through thorough analysis and suitable technical measures.

Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 12.5.2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.

Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.

6
artefacts
2
held by a system
1
at each review
moderate
to go live
Backup / DR tooling
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Account data location register including backups and out-of-CDE findings · Backup / DR tooling
  • Data discovery tool results, where such a tool is used · Document repository

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Annual scope confirmation report with date and approver · Policy repository / GRC workspace

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Updated data-flow diagrams by payment stage and channel · Document repository
  • Segmentation control list with out-of-scope justifications · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Third-party connection inventory · Vendor register / contract repository

First move

Start with the 2 of 6 artefacts that already live in a system (Backup / DR tooling); keep the periodic reviews but log each one as a dated record with a named reviewer.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

12.5.1 Inventory of in-scope system components · 12.5.2.1 Six-monthly scope confirmation for service providers