EvidenceSheet

11.3.1.2 Authenticated internal vulnerability scanning

Internal vulnerability scans must use authenticated scanning, with these conditions: systems that cannot accept scanning credentials are documented; systems that do accept credentials are scanned with sufficient privileges; and where scanning accounts permit interactive logins, those accounts are governed per Requirement 8.2.2. Applicability: authenticated tools may run on the host or over the network. 'Sufficient' privileges means enough access to system resources for a thorough scan that finds known vulnerabilities. The requirement does not cover components unable to accept credentials, such as mainframes, containers and certain network or security appliances. Objective under the customized approach: automated tools can find vulnerabilities local to each system that are invisible from a remote vantage point. Future-dated: treated as a best practice up to 31 March 2025 and mandatory since then.

Source: PCI DSS v4.0.1, 11.3.1.2. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open PCI DSS v4.0.1 in the compliance library.

Version 4.0.1 is the active version; 4.0 has been retired. Appendix A1 applies only to multi-tenant service providers, A2 only to card-present POS POI terminals that still use SSL or early TLS, and A3 only when a payment brand or acquirer requires it. Which requirements apply to you follows your validation type.

4
artefacts
2
held by a system
1
at each review
easy
to go live
Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

  • Scan policy configuration showing credentialed scanning enabled per target group · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling
  • Scan reports indicating successful authentication (credential check results) · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Scan service account records, ownership and 8.2.2 controls for interactive-capable accounts · Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • List of systems unable to accept credentials with rationale · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

Automate the pull from your Vulnerability scanner / patch tooling. Scan schedule, findings and remediation age straight from the scanner; patch compliance from the patch console.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

11.3.1.1 Lower-risk vulnerabilities handled per risk analysis · 11.3.1.3 Internal scans after significant change