PO.3.1 Supporting Toolchain Selection
Select tools that meet the security needs of the development environment. Evaluate tools for their own security and for the assurance they provide about the software they process.
Source: NIST SP 800-218 (SSDF), PO.3.1. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-218 (SSDF) in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Vendor security assessments · Vendor register / contract repository
- Configuration review for chosen tools · Cloud console / configuration management
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Tool selection criteria document · Document repository
- Deprecation policy for unsupported tools · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- tools selected on price without security review
- vendor self attestations not validated
- deprecated tools remain in pipelines
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetPO.2.3 Obtain Management Commitment to Secure Development · PO.3.2 Toolchain Configuration and Integration