RS.MA-05 The criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
The criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
Source: NIST CSF 2.0, RS.MA-05. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST CSF 2.0 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Decision log linking response to recovery handoff · SIEM / log platform
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Joint review by IR and recovery teams · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Recovery initiation criteria documented · Document repository
- Tabletop coverage of the response to recovery boundary · Document repository
- Closure of recovery initiation actions · Document repository
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Recovery initiation criteria absent
- Handoff informal and verbal
- Joint reviews not held
- Tabletops omit recovery handoff
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetRS.MA-04 Incidents are escalated or elevated as needed · RS.MI-01 Incidents are contained