PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and…
Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
Source: NIST CSF 2.0, PR.AA-05. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST CSF 2.0 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Privileged access management deployment evidence · Identity provider / directory
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Periodic access reviews with sign off · Document repository
- Just in time access workflow records · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Access policy framework with role definitions · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Segregation of duties matrix · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Standing privileges still common
- Access reviews rubber stamped
- SoD conflicts unresolved
- JIT scoped to operations only
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetPR.AA-04 Identity assertions are protected, conveyed, and verified · PR.AA-06 Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced commensurate with risk