GV.RM-07 Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational…
Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational cybersecurity risk discussions
Source: NIST CSF 2.0, GV.RM-07. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST CSF 2.0 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Risk assessment outputs tagged for improvement opportunities · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Trend analysis on recurring assessment themes · Document repository
- Annual improvement review by the risk committee · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Improvement backlog seeded from assessments · Document repository
- Closure tracking from finding to remediation · Document repository
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Findings closed without verifying remediation
- No trending across assessment cycles
- Improvements stuck in backlog beyond SLA
- Committee not informed of recurrence
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetGV.RM-06 A standardized method for calculating, documenting, categorizing, and prioritizing cybersecurity risks is… · GV.RR-01 Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is…