GV.PO-02 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes…
Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission
Source: NIST CSF 2.0, GV.PO-02. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST CSF 2.0 in the compliance library.
These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
- Change log per policy with rationale and approver · SIEM / log platform
- Enforcement evidence (audit findings, disciplinary records redacted) · HR system / LMS
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Annual policy effectiveness review report · Policy repository / GRC workspace
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Policy review schedule with last and next review dates · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Communication plan for policy updates · Policy repository / GRC workspace
First move
Common gaps auditors find
- Reviews slip beyond declared cadence
- Updates not communicated to all populations
- No metrics on enforcement outcomes
- Effectiveness review treated as a tick box
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetGV.PO-01 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity… · GV.RM-01 Risk management objectives are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders