DE.AE-07 Cyber threat intelligence and other contextual information are integrated into the analysis
Cyber threat intelligence and other contextual information are integrated into the analysis.
5
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Quarterly CTI value assessment report · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Threat intelligence platform integration with SIEM · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Indicator lifecycle policy with expiry and tiering · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Analyst pivot guide combining CTI with internal context · Document repository
- Subscription roster with feed quality scoring · Document repository
First move
This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.
Common gaps auditors find
- CTI feeds duplicated rather than deduplicated
- No mapping of CTI to crown jewel assets
- Stale indicators inflate false positive rate
- Intel only consumed in SOC, not informing IR or risk
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetDE.AE-06 Information on adverse events is provided to authorized staff and tools · DE.AE-08 Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria