MP-1.4 The business value or context of business use has been clearly defined or, in the case of assessing existing AI systems, re-evaluated
The business value or context of business use has been clearly defined or – in the case of assessing existing AI systems – re-evaluated. Business value is stated in terms that can be checked after deployment, and for sys
4
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Re-evaluation records for AI systems already in operation · Document repository
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- The documented business value or use context for the system · Document repository
- The measures by which value is judged after deployment · Policy repository / GRC workspace
- Analysis of how the social context of use bears on the value claimed · Document repository
First move
This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.
Common gaps auditors find
- Value defined at business-case stage and never re-tested against outcomes
- Existing systems inherited with no re-evaluation performed
- Value stated only as cost saving, ignoring how the system is used and by whom
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetMP-1.3 The organization's mission and relevant goals for the AI technology are understood and documented · MP-1.5 Organizational risk tolerances are determined and documented