EvidenceSheet
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · MANAGE - NIST AI RMF 1.0

MN-1.3 Responses to the AI risks deemed high priority as identified by the MAP function are developed, planned, and…

Responses to the AI risks deemed high priority as identified by the Map function, are developed, planned, and documented. Risk response options can include mitigating, transferring, avoiding, or accepting. High-priority risks each carry a planned and documented response naming which of the four options was chosen, with acceptance recorded as a decision rather than as inaction.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, MN-1.3. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Document repository
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Acceptance decisions recorded with the accepting authority · Document repository

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Documented responses for each high-priority risk, naming the option chosen · Document repository
  • Response plans with owner, action and target date · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Traceability from the mapped risk to its response · Document repository

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

MN-1.2 Treatment of documented AI risks is prioritized based on impact, likelihood, or available resources or methods · MN-1.4 Negative residual risks, defined as the sum of all unmitigated risks, to both downstream acquirers of AI…