EvidenceSheet
NIST AI RMF 1.0 · GOVERN - NIST AI RMF 1.0

GV-1.6 Mechanisms are in place to inventory AI systems and are resourced according to organizational risk priorities

Mechanisms are in place to inventory AI systems and are resourced according to organizational risk priorities. A maintained inventory identifies the AI systems and models in use, and the resource given to maintaining it is proportionate to the risk the inventoried systems carry.

Source: NIST AI RMF 1.0, GV-1.6. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST AI RMF 1.0 in the compliance library.

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Evidence of periodic reconciliation between the inventory and systems actually in production · Policy repository / GRC workspace

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • The AI system and model inventory with the fields it captures per entry · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • The intake process that causes a new system or model to be added · Document repository
  • Named owner and resourcing for inventory maintenance · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

GV-1.5 Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned… · GV-1.7 Processes and procedures are in place for decommissioning and phasing out of AI systems safely and in a…