EvidenceSheet
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · SA - System and Services Acquisition

SA-21 Developer Screening

Require that the developer of organization-defined system, system component, or system service: a. Has appropriate access authorizations as determined by assigned organization-defined official government duties; and b. Satisfies the following additional personnel screening criteria: organization-defined additional personnel screening criteria.

Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, SA-21. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.

Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.

10
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Test of Organizational processes for developer screening; mechanisms supporting developer screening · HR system / LMS

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • System and services acquisition policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Personnel security policy and procedures · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedures addressing personnel screening · HR system / LMS
  • System design documentation · Document repository
  • Acquisition documentation · Document repository
  • Service level agreements · Vendor register / contract repository
  • Acquisition contracts for developer services · Vendor register / contract repository
  • System configuration settings and associated documentation · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • List of appropriate access authorizations required by the developers of the system · Document repository

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

SA-20 Customized Development of Critical Components · SA-22 Unsupported System Components