EvidenceSheet

PE-3 Physical Access Control

a. Enforce physical access authorizations at organization-defined entry and exit points to the facility where the system resides by: 1. Verifying individual access authorizations before granting access to the facility; and 2. Controlling ingress and egress to the facility using Selection (one or more): [organization-defined physical access control systems or devices; guards]; b. Maintain physical access audit logs for organization-defined entry or exit points; c. Control access to areas within the facility designated as publicly accessible by implementing the following controls: organization-defined physical access controls; d. Escort visitors and control visitor activity organization-defined circumstances requiring visitor escorts and control of visitor activity; e. Secure keys, combinations, and other physical access devices; f. Inventory organization-defined physical access devices every organization-defined frequency; and g. Change combinations and keys organization-defined frequency and/or when keys are lost, combinations are compromised, or when individuals possessing the keys or combinations are transferred or terminated.

Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, PE-3. The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.

Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.

10
artefacts
0
held by a system
4
at each review
hard
to go live
Policy repository / GRC workspace
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • Physical access control logs or records · Physical access / facilities
  • Inventory records of physical access control devices · Physical access / facilities
  • Records of key and lock combination changes · Physical access / facilities
  • Test of Organizational processes for physical access control; mechanisms supporting and/or implementing physical access control; physical access control devices · Physical access / facilities

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

  • Physical and environmental protection policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Procedures addressing physical access control · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • System entry and exit points · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Storage locations for physical access control devices · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • Physical access control devices · Policy repository / GRC workspace
  • List of security safeguards controlling access to designated publicly accessible areas within facility · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

PE-2(3) Physical Access Authorizations | Restrict Unescorted Access · PE-3(1) Physical Access Control | System Access