What is the most common gap auditors find on AU-12(4)?

Query parameters of user queries against PII data sets are not audited

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · AU - Audit and Accountability

`AU-12(4)` Audit Record Generation | Query Parameter Audits of Personally Identifiable Information

Q: What evidence do auditors commonly ask for on AU-12(4) Audit Record Generation | Query Parameter Audits of Personally Identifiable Information?

Audit and accountability policy; System security plan; Privacy plan; Procedures addressing audit record generation; Query event records; System design documentation.

Provide and implement the capability for auditing the parameters of user query events for data sets containing personally identifiable information.

Source: NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, AU-12(4). The statement above is our statement of the clause, read from the published text and cited so you can check it against the official text, not the instrument verbatim. Open NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 in the compliance library.

Base controls and their enhancements. Which apply follows the baseline you are assessed against (for example FedRAMP Moderate or High, or the low, moderate and high baselines of SP 800-53B). Text in square brackets is a parameter your organisation sets.

artefacts

held by a system

at each review

hard

to go live

Policy repository / GRC workspace

where the evidence lives

teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review. To go live: easy when half or more of the artefacts are already held by a system, moderate from a quarter to a half, hard below a quarter.

These are the artefacts auditors commonly ask for on this requirement, our guidance rather than text from the standard. Your assessor decides what is sufficient in your context, and asks for samples across the period when a report covers one.

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

Query event records · Policy repository / GRC workspace
System audit records · Policy repository / GRC workspace
Test of Mechanisms implementing audit record generation capability · Policy repository / GRC workspace

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

Audit and accountability policy · Policy repository / GRC workspace
System security plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
Privacy plan · Policy repository / GRC workspace
Procedures addressing audit record generation · Policy repository / GRC workspace
System design documentation · Policy repository / GRC workspace
System configuration settings and associated documentation · Policy repository / GRC workspace
Map of system data actions · Policy repository / GRC workspace

First move

No system holds this evidence for you: it is people and documents. Reminders and routing to the owner still save time. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date.

Common gaps auditors find

Query parameters of user queries against PII data sets are not audited
The data sets containing PII subject to query parameter auditing were never identified

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

AU-12(3) Audit Record Generation | Changes by Authorized Individuals · AU-13 Monitoring for Information Disclosure