AT-1 Policy and procedures for awareness and training
Requires an awareness and training policy plus supporting procedures to be written, approved, distributed to defined personnel, assigned to a named official, and reviewed and updated on a defined frequency and after defi
5
artefacts
0
held by a system
1
at each review
hard
to go live
HR system / LMS
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review
system holds itEvidence a system already holds
none for this control
periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review
- Review record against the defined frequency and any triggering event · HR system / LMS
governing documentDocuments that govern the control
- Approved awareness and training policy with scope, approver and date · HR system / LMS
- Evidence the policy reached the defined recipients · HR system / LMS
- Designation of the official accountable for the training programme · HR system / LMS
- Procedures describing how training is assigned, delivered and tracked · HR system / LMS
First move
This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.
Common gaps auditors find
- Training policy inherited from a corporate handbook and never tailored to this system
- No defined review cadence, so content ages past its relevance
- Policy silent on contractors and third party personnel who use the system
Do this for your whole sheet
Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.
Build my evidence sheetAC-25 Reference Monitor. Implement a reference monitor for [organization-defined] that is tamperproof, always invoked, and small enough to be subject to analysis and testing, the completeness of which can be assured · AT-2 Literacy training and awareness