EvidenceSheet

AC-22 Publicly accessible content

Requires named individuals to be authorized and trained to publish information publicly, content to be reviewed for nonpublic information before it is posted, and published content to be re-reviewed on a defined frequenc

4
artefacts
0
held by a system
4
at each review
hard
to go live
Identity provider / directory
where the evidence lives
teal = a system already holds it · olive = produced at each review

system holds itEvidence a system already holds

none for this control

periodic reviewEvidence produced at each review

  • List of individuals authorized to publish, with evidence of the training they received · Identity provider / directory
  • Pre-publication review records showing sign-off before posting · Identity provider / directory
  • Periodic sweep results of live public content against the defined review frequency · Identity provider / directory
  • Removal or takedown records for nonpublic information found on public surfaces · Identity provider / directory

governing documentDocuments that govern the control

none for this control

First move

This control is evidenced by people and documents, not systems. Put the document under version control with an owner and review date, and log each review as a record with reviewer and date. Do not try to automate it.

Common gaps auditors find

Do this for your whole sheet

Paste the rows you run your controls from and get this mapping for every control at once, with the periodic-review ones flagged and a first move per row. No account for the first run.

Build my evidence sheet

AC-21 Information Sharing. Enable authorized users to determine whether access authorizations assigned to a sharing partner match the information's access and use restrictions for [organization-defined] ; and Employ [organization-defined] to assist users in making information · AC-23 Data Mining Protection. Employ [organization-defined] for [organization-defined] to detect and protect against unauthorized data mining